|
|
RESEARCH
________________________________________________________
PUBLISHED AND FORTHCOMING PAPERS
________________________________________________________
"A Model of Positive Self-Image in
Subjective Assessments"
(with Joel Sobel)
American Economic Review, 2005, Vol. 95, No. 5, 1386-1402.
Paper
This paper suggests a mechanism that describes individuals' positive
self image in subjective assessments of their relative abilities. The
mechanism assumes individuals have heterogeneous production functions
that determine ability as a function of multiple skills, individuals
make skill-enhancing investments with the goal of maximizing their
ability, and make ability comparisons using their own production
function. Within this framework, the paper provides conditions under
which there is positive self image. Positive self image is increasing
in the ease of the task, the number of different skills needed for the
task, and the variability of production technologies in the
population. JEL Codes: A12, D01; Keywords: Self-image; Behavioral economics;
Psychology.
________________________________________________________
"Positive Self-Image and Incentives
in Organizations"
The Economic Journal, 2008, Vol. 118, 1315-1332.
Paper
This paper
investigates the implications of individuals' mistaken beliefs of
their abilities on incentives in organizations using the
principal-agent model of moral hazard. The paper shows that if effort
is observable, then an agent's mistaken beliefs about own ability are
always favorable to the principal. However, if effort is unobservable,
then an agent's mistaken beliefs about own ability can be either
favorable or unfavorable to the principal. The paper provides
conditions under which an agent's over estimation about own ability is
favorable to the principal when effort is unobservable. Finally, the
paper shows that workers' mistaken beliefs about their coworkers'
abilities make interdependent incentive schemes more attractive to
firms than individualistic incentive schemes. JEL Codes: A12; J41. Keywords:
Self-Image; Optimism; Incentives, Behavioral Economics.
________________________________________________________
"Making Sense of the Experimental Evidence on
Endogenous Timing in Duopoly Markets."
Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization, 2008, Vol. 68, 657-666.
Paper
The prediction of asymmetric equilibria with Stackelberg outcomes is
clearly the most frequent result in the endogenous timing literature.
Several experiments have tried to validate this prediction
empirically, but failed to find support for it. By contrast, the
experiments find that simultaneous-move outcomes are modal and that
behavior in endogenous timing games is quite heterogeneous. This paper
generalizes Hamilton and Slutsky's (1990) endogenous timing games by
assuming that players are averse to inequality in payoffs. I explore
the theoretical implications of inequity aversion and compare them to
the empirical evidence. I find that this explanation is able to
organize most of the experimental evidence on endogenous timing games.
However, inequity aversion is not able to explain delay in Hamilton
and Slutsky's endogenous timing games. JEL Codes: C72,
D43, D63, L13. Keywords: Endogenous Timing; Cournot; Stackelberg;
Inequity Aversion.
________________________________________________________
"Asymmetries in Information Processing in a Decision
Theory Framework"
Theory and Decision, 2009, Vol. 66, 317-343. Paper
Research in psychology suggests that some individuals
are more sensitive to positive than to negative information while
others are more sensitive to negative rather than positive
information. I take these cognitive positive-negative asymmetries in
information processing to a Bayesian decision-theory model and explore
its consequences in terms of decisions and payoffs. I show that in
monotone decision problems economic agents with more
positive-responsive information structures are always better off,
ex-ante, when they face problems where payoffs are relatively more
sensitive to the action chosen when the state of nature is favorable.
JEL Codes: A12, D81. Keywords: Information Processing; Decision
Theory.
________________________________________________________
"Positive Self-Image in Tournaments."
International Economic Review, 2010, Vol. 51, No. 2, 475-496.
Paper
This
paper analyzes the implications of worker overestimation of
productivity for firms in which incentives take the form of
tournaments. Each worker overestimates his productivity but is aware of
the bias in his opponent’s self-assessment. The manager of the
firm, on the other hand, correctly assesses workers’
productivities and self-beliefs when setting tournament prizes. The
paper shows that, under a variety of circumstances, firms can benefit
from worker positive self-image. The paper also shows that worker
positive self-image can improve welfare in tournaments.In contrast,
workers’ utility declines due to their own misguided choices. JEL Codes: A12, J41; Keywords:
Positive Self-image, Tournaments, Behavioral economics.
________________________________________________________
"Overconfidence in Tournaments:
Evidence from the Field"
(with Young-Joon Park)
Theory and Decision, 2010, Vol. 69, 143-166.
Paper
This
paper uses a field survey to investigate the quality of
individuals’ beliefs of relative performance in tournaments. We
consider two field settings, poker and chess, which differ in the
degree to which luck is a factor and also in the information that
players have about the ability of the competition. We find that poker
players’ forecasts of relative performance are random guesses
with an overestimation bias. Chess players also overestimate their
relative performance but make informed guesses. We find support for the
“unskilled and unaware hypothesis” in chess: high skilled
chess players make better forecasts than low skilled chess players.
Finally, we find that chess players’ forecasts of relativeperformance are not efficient. JEL Codes: A12,
C93, J41; Keywords: Tournaments; Rationality; Learning; Field
Experiment.
________________________________________________________
"The
Impact of Firm Cost and Market Size Asymmetries on National Mergers in
a Three-Country Model"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2010, Vol. 28, 682-694.
Paper
This
paper studies the impact of firm cost and market size asymmetries on merger
decisions. I consider a model where a small and a large
country compete in a third (world) market. Each of the two countries
has two firms (with potentially different costs) that supply the
domestic market and export to the third market. Merger decisions in the
two countries are modeled as a simultaneously move game. The paper
finds that firms in the large country have more incentives to merge
than firms in the small country. In contrast, the government of the
large country has more incentives to block a merger than the government
of the small country. Thus, the model predicts that conflicts of
interest between governments and firms concerning national mergers are
more likely in large countries than in small ones. JEL Codes: F13, H77,L11, L41. Keywords: Mergers; International
Trade; Merger Policy; Size Asymmetry.
________________________________________________________
"Labor Market Signaling and Self-Confidence: Wage Compression and the Gender Pay Gap"
Journal of Labor Economics, forthcoming.
This version: December 2011.
Paper
I
extend Spence’s (1973) signaling model by assuming some workers
are overconfident—they underestimate their marginal cost of
acquiring education—and some are underconfident. Firms cannot
observe workers’ productive abilities and beliefs but know the
fractions of high-ability, overconfident, and underconfident workers. I
find that biased beliefs lower the wage spread and compress the wages
of unbiased workers. I show that gender differences in self-confidence
can contribute to the gender pay gap. If education raises productivity, men are overconfident, and women
underconfident, then women will, on average, earn less than men.
Finally, I show that biased beliefs can improve welfare. JEL Codes: D03; D82; J24; J31. Keywords: Signaling; Education; Self-Confidence; Wage Compression; Gender Pay Gap.
________________________________________________________
WORKING PAPERS
________________________________________________________
"A Cognitive Hierarchy
Model of Behavior in Endogenous Timing Games"
(with Daniel Carvalho)
Revise and resubmit International Journal of Game Theory
This version: October 2010.
Paper
We
apply the cognitive hierarchy model of Camerer, Ho and Chong
(2004)—where players have different levels of reasoning—to
the action commitment game of Hamilton and Slutsky (1990)—a
duopoly with endogenous timing of entry. We show that, for a reasonable
average number of thinking steps, the model predicts a high percentage
of Cournot outcomes including delay, and outcomes where the first mover
chooses a quantity greater than Cournot but smaller than Stackelberg
leader. We also show that the model can explain the most important
features of the experimental evidence on the action commitment game in Huck, Müeller and Normann (2002). JEL Codes: C72, D43, L13; Keywords: Endogenous Timing Games; Thinking Steps; Cognitive Hierarchy.
________________________________________________________
"Self-Confidence and Teamwork: An Experimental Test"
(with Isabelle Vialle and Jean-Louis Rullière)
This version: September 2011. Paper
We use a laboratory experiment to study how perceptions of skill
influence teamwork. Our design is based on Gervais and Goldstein (2007)
theory of teams. Team output is increasing in skill and in effort,
skill and effort are complements, and workers’ efforts choices
are complements. An overconfident agent thinks that his skill is higher
than it actually is. We find that the presence of overconfident workers
in teams is beneficial for firms since it raises effort provision and
team output. We also find that overconfidence leads to a Pareto
improvement in workers’ payoffs. In contrast, underconfidence is
detrimental to firms as well as workers. JEL Codes: D81; C91.
Keywords: Teamwork; Self-Confidence; Laboratory Experiment.
________________________________________________________
"Entrepreneurial Overconfidence, Self-Financing, and Capital Market Efficiency"
(with Michele Dell'Era)
This version: October 2011. Paper
This paper studies the impact
of entrepreneurial overconfidence on self-financing and capital-market
efficiency. We generalize Rochet and Freixas (2008) model of
competitive capital markets with adverse selection by assuming some
entrepreneurs are overconfident and others underconfident. We show that
the existence of biased entrepreneurs lowers the equilibrium fraction
of projects' self-financing. We find that entrepreneurial
overconfidence reduces capital-market efficiency when (i) no
entrepreneur is underconfident or (ii) risk aversion is low and the
ratio of overconfident to underconfident entrepreneurs is high.
However, overconfidence improves capital-market efficiency when risk
aversion is high and the ratio of overconfident to underconfident
entrepreneurs is moderate. JEL Codes: D82; G11; G14; G32; Keywords: Signaling; Overconfidence; Market Efficiency; Self-Finance.
________________________________________________________
"Preference
for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory"
(with Thomas Astebro and José Mata)
This version: September 2011.
Paper Appendix
A
laboratory experiment investigates how positive skew influences risky
choices. A new non-parametric method classifies subjects according to
risk and skew preferences and test whether choices are compatible with
expected utility. Both students and executives make riskier choices
when lotteries display positive skew. Approximately half of the
subjects make skew seeking choices, and half violate expected utility
axioms. Students and executives preferences for skew are similar.
Combining structural estimation with the non-parametric method, we find
that skew seeking (averse) choices are driven by an interaction between
concave (convex) utility and inverse s-shape (s-shape) probability weighting. JEL Codes: D81, C91;
Keywords: Decision Making under Risk, Skew, Heterogeneity, Laboratory Experiment.
________________________________________________________
"Risk Taking in Mixed Gambles"
(with Thomas Astebro and José Mata)
This version: December 2011.
Paper
We
propose a task for eliciting attitudes towards risk which offers an
economical way of uncovering heterogeneity in risk preferences. The
task consists of accepting or rejecting mixed gambles that provide a
gain with probability p and a loss with probability 1-p.
Using mixed gambles allow us to simultaneously evaluate all features of
risk preferences proposed by prospect theory. We find that roughly two
thirds of the subjects behave according to prospect theory and one
third as expected utility maximizers. Probability weighting matters the
most in explaining decisions followed by diminishing sensitivity to
outcomes. No evidence of loss aversion is found. JEL Codes: D81, C91;
Keywords: Probability Weighting, Risk, Skew, Loss Aversion, Experiment.
________________________________________________________
"Overconfidence and Timing of Entry" (with Tiago Pires)
This version: September 2010.
Paper
We
analyze the impact of overconfidence on the timing of entry in markets,
profits, and welfare using Branco’s (2008) extension of Hamilton
and Slutsky’s (1900) quantity commitment game. Players have
private information about costs, one player is overconfident, and the
other one rational. We find that for moderate levels of overconfidence
there is a unique cost-dependent equilibrium where the overconfident
player has a higher ex-ante probability of being the Stackelberg
leader. Overconfidence lowers the profit of the rational player but can
increase that of the overconfident player. Consumer rents increase with
overconfidence while producer rents decrease which leads to an
ambiguous welfare effect. JEL Codes: A12, C72, D43, D82, L10; Keywords: Endogenous Timing, Entry, Overconfidence.
________________________________________________________
"Tacit Collusion under
Fairness and Reciprocity" (with Doruk Iris)
This version: May 2011.
Paper
This
paper departs from the standard profit-maximizing model of firm
behavior by assuming that managers are motivated in part by personal
animosity—or respect—towards their rivals. A reciprocal
manager responds to unkind behavior of rivals with unkind actions
(negative reciprocity), while at the same time, it responds to kind
behavior of rivals with kind actions (positive reciprocity). We provide
conditions on managers’ perceptions of fair actions of their
rivals under which collusive action profiles (prices or quantities) are
easier to sustain. Thus, fairness and reciprocity concerns among
managers can have adverse welfare consequences for consumers. JEL Codes: D43, D63, L13, L21; Keywords: Fairness; Reciprocity; Collusion; Repeated Games.
________________________________________________________
|